University Textbooks; Research and Writting

University Textbooks; Research and Writting

Curriculum and reflective teaching of history based on a competency-based design

Document Type : Research Paper

Author
aazam RahimiJaberi
Assistant Professor, Department of History Education, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
10.30487/rwab.2026.2066847.1657
Abstract
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Paying attention to curriculum knowledge and utilizing this area to review, organize, and design a suitable program for specialized academic disciplines is a fundamental and effective step in achieving the goals of any academic discipline. The present study was conducted with the aim of examining the output of the history curriculum in order to achieve an appropriate curriculum model.Method: Accordingly, the present study has utilized a descriptive-analytical and applied approach and documentary method based on domestic and foreign research and lived experience, and by posing this question: What is the level of desirability of the curriculum and history education and its impact on the academic and professional competence of learners?? Examines content and educational challenges that are disproportionate to the mission of this science and the needs of society in order to explain its revision and developments.Discussion and Conclusion: A review of historical data and the lived experience of researchers indicates that the lack of a theoretical and practical framework and a coherent and efficient operational plan for teaching andThe evaluation of history lessons, unrealistic orientations, and the inadequacy of the history curriculum in strengthening the academic, social, and career competencies of graduates have led to the failure to achieve the goals of this science and reduced its capabilities and skills.As a result, in order to fundamentally transform and adapt the science of history.

Introduction
Curriculum design and educational planning constitute the heart and core of any educational system, undergoing continuous refinement and development through ongoing evaluation processes. Curriculum design involves formulating objectives, determining learning content and materials, and developing innovative teaching and assessment methods—all aimed at effective and practical education that ensures comprehensiveness and alignment with contemporary issues while fostering beneficial learning outcomes (Yarmohammadian, 2013; Maleki, 2005). Within this framework, history holds a distinguished position, as it represents the collective consciousness and historical identity of the Iranian nation, teaching civic lessons and transforming learners into productive citizens (Puteh, Maarof & Tak, 2010). History is considered a fundamental theoretical science whose purpose extends beyond merely chronicling past events to developing historical thinking—enabling better understanding of present circumstances and anticipating the future as tomorrow's history.
Despite its significance, history education has increasingly distanced itself from its authentic purpose. The predominantly descriptive, memorization-based approach, combined with the political instrumentalization of historical narratives, has transformed history into a repository of memorized facts rather than a living, dynamic discipline capable of fostering critical thinking, national cohesion, and social responsibility (Askari, 2010; Maleki Tavani, 2010). The curriculum has been heavily influenced by political currents, with historical narratives often shaped to legitimize ruling powers, marginalizing economic, social, and cultural dimensions in favor of dynastic and political history. The banking model of education—where students are treated as passive recipients of information—has further undermined the discipline's transformative potential (Freire, 1979).
This situation demands a fundamental rethinking of history curriculum and pedagogy. A competency-based approach that prioritizes the development of historical thinking, critical analysis, research skills, and reflective judgment is essential for preparing graduates capable of meeting contemporary societal needs. Such an approach requires moving beyond content transmission toward fostering inquiry-based, problem-oriented, and student-centered learning experiences. This study aims to assess the extent to which the current history curriculum and instruction align with educational objectives and competency development needs, identify existing challenges, and propose practical solutions for curriculum improvement. The research is guided by three core questions: To what extent does the current history curriculum address educational goals and learner needs? What are the primary challenges facing history curriculum and instruction? What strategies can enhance the effectiveness of history education in developing student competencies?

Research Methodology
This research employs a documentary-analytical approach within a qualitative-descriptive framework, utilizing both primary and secondary sources related to history curriculum and pedagogy. The methodology combines document analysis of official curriculum documents, educational program descriptions, and historical sources, with insights drawn from the researchers' lived experiences and professional expertise in history education. Data collection involved systematic examination of relevant domestic and international sources, including curriculum documents, academic studies, and historical texts, with emphasis on evaluating content validity, authenticity, and relevance to the research questions.
The analysis process followed a systematic approach: first, identifying and categorizing relevant documents and sources; second, extracting key themes related to curriculum structure, content organization, pedagogical approaches, and competency development; third, synthesizing findings through comparative analysis across sources; and fourth, deriving implications for curriculum reform. The researcher's field experience in history education at Farhangian University informed the interpretation of findings, particularly regarding the alignment between curriculum objectives and actual classroom practices. The analysis focused on three levels of historical understanding: history as chronicle (descriptive knowledge), history as interpretation (analytical thinking), and history as reflective practice (critical engagement with the past and its relevance to present-future concerns). The framework draws on established scholarship in history education, including Walsh's conception of historical knowledge as process rather than product and Lowenthal's emphasis on the connection between past and present consciousness.

Discussion
Critical Assessment of the Current History Curriculum
Analysis of the official history curriculum reveals significant misalignment between stated objectives and actual content organization. The curriculum, initially developed in the 1980s and revised over subsequent decades, remains predominantly oriented toward political and dynastic history, prioritizing the chronology of rulers, wars, and state formations over social, economic, cultural, and intellectual developments. This orientation reflects the broader historical context in which the curriculum was formulated—a period of revolutionary transformation that influenced the selection and framing of historical content (Maleki Tavani, 2010; Siamian Gorji & Salehi, 2013). The curriculum structure comprises general, compulsory, specialized, and elective courses totaling 134-135 credits for the undergraduate history program, with political history dominating the core requirements.
However, the current curriculum fails to adequately prepare graduates for the diverse professional roles outlined in official documentation—including positions in cultural heritage, tourism, museums, media, cultural diplomacy, archives, and international relations. The practical competencies required for these roles—such as textual criticism, historical editing, oral history methodology, museum curation, and public history—remain underdeveloped or entirely absent. As one analysis notes, "Despite revisions, the curriculum remains far from the stated goals and the actual needs of society; it is still a serial history based on the biographies of powerful figures who experienced cycles of rise and fall" (Maleki Tavani, 2010: 178-179). This disconnect between curriculum intentions and outcomes represents a fundamental challenge requiring systematic reform.
Political Instrumentalization and Historical Bias
A major impediment to effective history education is the persistent influence of political considerations on curriculum content. Historical narratives have often been shaped to legitimize ruling powers, with particular attention to selective representation of dynasties, glorification of certain figures, and suppression or marginalization of others. During the Pahlavi period, ancient Persian history was emphasized, and the Qajar dynasty was systematically denigrated to legitimize the modernizing project (Askari, 2010: 163-164). Post-1979, similar tendencies emerged as scholars sought to establish new historical benchmarks, with some attempting to designate the rise of the Safavid dynasty as the beginning of modern Iranian history (Maleki Tavani, 2022: 162-163). As one scholar observed, "No field of knowledge has been untouched by the influence of government interests... rulers, to gain legitimacy, neutralize opposition and criticism" (Robinson, 2000: 203-204; Shakouri, 1992: 114).
This instrumentalization contradicts the fundamental purpose of historical study—learning from the past. When history becomes a tool for legitimizing power rather than understanding complex human experiences, it loses its critical and reflective potential. The consequences include distorted historical consciousness, uncritical acceptance of official narratives, and diminished capacity for democratic citizenship. Research suggests that students often emerge from history courses without genuine historical understanding, having memorized names, dates, and events without developing the ability to analyze, interpret, or apply historical knowledge to contemporary challenges (Paul, 2020: 166; Shabani, 1997: 24). The solution requires moving beyond state-centric narratives toward histories that incorporate multiple perspectives, including the experiences of ordinary people, women, and marginalized communities.
Content and Pedagogy: The Banking Model and Its Limitations
The predominant pedagogical approach in history education follows what Freire (1979) characterized as the "banking model"—where teachers deposit information into passive students, who are expected to store and reproduce content mechanically. This approach transforms students into "compliant, accommodating, passive data repositories" and minimizes their capacity for critical and creative thinking. History is reduced to memorization of chronologies, names, and events, with little opportunity for interpretation, debate, or application. As Freire argued, this method "seeks to conceal certain realities and resists dialogue," ultimately serving to "minimize or destroy students' creative power" and "reinforce the notion that social conditions are predetermined."
The banking model is particularly problematic in history education, where the discipline's very nature demands interpretation, perspective-taking, and the construction of meaning from evidence. Historical understanding is not about accumulating facts but about developing the capacity to analyze sources, recognize bias, construct arguments, and derive lessons for present-future decision-making (Stanford, 2005: 255-258; Dewey, 1969: 90). The teacher-centered, transmission-oriented approach further distances history from its potential as a transformative educational experience. Research has demonstrated that history learning is most effective when students are actively engaged in inquiry, discussion, and problem-solving (McKeown & Beck, 1990; Yilmaz, 2008; Wijayasari et al., 2020). The dominance of content coverage over skill development means students may complete their studies with extensive factual knowledge but limited ability to think historically.
Competency-Based History Education: Toward an Integrated and Reflective Approach
A competency-based approach to history education requires fundamental shifts in how history is conceptualized and taught. First, history should be understood as history as interpretation (critical thinking) rather than history as chronicle (descriptive account). The distinction between "history of events" (what happened) and "historical thinking" (how we understand and explain events) is crucial—the former focuses on description, while the latter demands analytical reasoning, source evaluation, and meaning-making (Stanford, 2005; Dewey, 1969). This distinction has practical implications for curriculum design: courses should emphasize historiographical methods, source criticism, and the construction of historical arguments over mere content transmission.
Second, the curriculum should adopt an integrated or comprehensive approach that moves beyond political history to incorporate economic, social, cultural, intellectual, and environmental dimensions. This integrated perspective recognizes that historical developments are multi-causal and that understanding requires examining interconnections among different spheres of human activity. Such an approach would enable graduates to work across various professional domains, including cultural heritage, education, media, tourism, and international relations (Maleki Tavani, 2010: 181-183). Specific course recommendations include: literary history, textual criticism and editing, historical geography, cultural and artistic history, and diplomacy and international relations.
Third, reflective and inquiry-based pedagogy should replace the banking model. This involves problem-based learning, where students examine historical questions through investigation and discussion; dialogical approaches, where teachers and students engage in mutual inquiry; and experiential learning, including oral history projects, archival research, museum visits, and public history initiatives. Such approaches develop critical thinking, historical imagination, and the ability to apply historical knowledge to contemporary challenges. Dewey's (1969: 90) emphasis on "education as experience" is particularly relevant: history should connect past, present, and future, helping learners understand how the past shapes current conditions and how they might act to improve their society.
Fourth, the curriculum should explicitly articulate the competencies history graduates should develop, including: critical and analytical thinking; research skills including archival research, oral history, and digital humanities methods; effective communication skills (writing, speaking, and multimedia); ethical reasoning and citizenship; intercultural understanding; and adaptability to evolving social and technological contexts. These competencies would align history education with broader goals of developing thoughtful, responsible, and creative citizens—the traditional mission of humanities education.

Historical Thinking Skills: Beyond Memorization to Analysis and Evaluation
Developing historical thinking skills requires sustained attention to the processes of historical reasoning, including: identifying and evaluating evidence from primary and secondary sources; understanding historical context and perspective; analyzing causation and consequence; recognizing continuity and change; constructing evidence-based arguments; interpreting historical narratives critically; and connecting past to present. Research has demonstrated the effectiveness of instructional strategies such as: analyzing multiple sources with conflicting perspectives; developing historical questions; constructing and defending interpretations; comparing past and present; and engaging in historical simulations and reenactments (Van Drie & Van Boxtel, 2005; Monte Sano, 2008; McGrew et al., 2018).
Reflective thinking is particularly important in history education, involving conscious consideration of experiences, assumptions, and perspectives to develop deeper understanding and informed action. Historical reflection requires examining events from multiple angles, recognizing that the same event can be understood differently depending on one's perspective, and applying these insights to contemporary challenges. As Abdullah (2019) suggests, structured reflective practices—including journaling, group discussions, and self-assessment—can help students develop more sophisticated historical thinking. The goal is not to produce students who simply know history, but who can think historically—evaluating claims, constructing arguments, and applying historical knowledge to real-world situations.
Practical Recommendations for Curriculum Renewal
Based on the analysis, several concrete recommendations emerge for history curriculum reform. Regarding content, the curriculum should: expand coverage beyond political history to include social, economic, cultural, and intellectual history; incorporate more non-Western and global perspectives; include histories of marginalized groups and ordinary people; and increase attention to contemporary historical scholarship and debates. With respect to pedagogy, reforms should: emphasize inquiry-based, student-centered learning; integrate primary source analysis and historical methods training; incorporate oral history, archival research, and digital humanities approaches; include field experiences such as museum visits and heritage site studies; and develop students' skills in historical writing and public engagement.
Regarding teacher preparation, the curriculum should: provide pre-service and in-service teachers with training in competency-based pedagogy; develop resources for teaching historical thinking skills; and create professional learning communities for history educators. Additionally, assessment practices should: evaluate historical thinking and skills, not just content knowledge; use performance-based assessments such as research papers, presentations, and portfolios; and provide meaningful feedback that supports continued improvement. Finally, institutional support should include: regular curriculum review and renewal; investment in teaching resources, technology, and library collections; and collaboration between universities, schools, and cultural heritage institutions.

Conclusion
This analysis reveals that the current history curriculum in Iranian universities suffers from fundamental shortcomings in both content and pedagogy that undermine its capacity to develop the competencies history graduates need. The curriculum remains heavily oriented toward political and dynastic history, reflecting the influence of political considerations and failing to incorporate the full range of human experience—economic, social, cultural, and intellectual dimensions essential for comprehensive historical understanding. Pedagogically, the persistence of the banking model—with its emphasis on passive reception and memorization—prevents the development of critical thinking, historical reasoning, and reflective judgment.
These challenges demand comprehensive reform of both curriculum content and instructional methods. A competency-based approach to history education should integrate multiple perspectives, develop critical analytical skills, connect past to present and future, and prepare graduates for meaningful professional contributions across diverse fields. This requires moving from history as chronicle to history as interpretation and reflective practice, from teacher-centered transmission to student-centered inquiry, and from content coverage to competency development. The proposed framework emphasizes: adopting an integrated, multi-dimensional approach to historical content; developing historical thinking skills including source evaluation, interpretation, and argumentation; implementing reflective, problem-based, and experiential pedagogy; and articulating clear competency outcomes aligned with professional and civic needs.
Ultimately, history education must contribute to the formation of thoughtful, responsible, and creative citizens who can draw on historical knowledge and thinking skills to address contemporary challenges. This mission requires institutional commitment to ongoing curriculum renewal, investment in faculty development, and collaboration across educational sectors and cultural institutions. By embracing these reforms, history can reclaim its vital role in developing critical consciousness, fostering social cohesion, and equipping citizens with the historical understanding essential for informed participation in democratic society. The research limitations include the documentary focus and reliance on existing data; future studies could employ empirical methods to examine actual classroom practices and graduate outcomes.
Keywords
History teaching
curriculum
historical thinking
competence
Subjects
ابن اثیر، عزالدین (1417)، الکامل فی التاریخ، ج1، حققه و اعتنی به الدکتور عمر عبدالسلام تدمری، الجزء الاول، بیروت: دارالکتب العربی.
احمدی، طاهره و احمدی، غلامعلی (1397)، «آموزش تاریخ ضرورت‌ها و شیوه‌های نوین»، رشد آموزش تاریخ، پاییز، دورة 20، شماره 1، پیاپی 69، صص 26-31.
استنفورد، مایکل (1384)، درآمدی بر تاریخ‌پژوهی، ترجمة مسعود صادقی، تهران، سمت و دانشگاه امام صادق (ع).
اسداللهی، فاطمه؛ مهرمحمدی، محمود (1398)، «واکاوی تأثیر  روایت‌نگاری تأملی بر توسعه حرفه‌ای دانشجو معلمان دانشگاه فرهنگیان؛ پدیدار شناختی تجارب زیسته»، پژوهش‌های آموزش و یادگیری، 16(2)، صص 87- 102.
باقری، خسرو (1389)، درآمدی بر فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت جمهوری اسلامی ایران، ج2، تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.
باقری، خسرو؛ باقری، محمدزهیر (1393)، «علیت جهان‌شناختی، عاملیت انسانی و اصول تعلیم و تربیت در دیدگاه غزالی»، دو فصلنامة پژوهشی علوم تربیتی از دیدگاه اسلام، صص 71- 92.
باقری، خسرو؛ سجادیه، نرگس (1390)، «هدف‌های درس تاریخ بر اساس رویکردی اسلامی در فلسفة برنامه درسی»، پژوهش‌های برنامة درسی، انجمن مطالعات برنامه درسی ایران، دورة اول، شمارة اول، بهار و تابستان، صص 111- 138.
 برنامه آموزشی تاریخ (1401)، تهران: وزارت علوم.
 دیویی، جان (1369)، تجربه و آموزش‌وپرورش، ترجمة اکبر میرحسینی، تهران: مرکز ترجمه و نشر کتاب.
دیوئی، جان ( 1393)، مقدمه‌ای بر فلسفه آموزش‌وپرورش یا دموکراسی و آموزش‌وپرورش، اشراق کویر.
دیویی، جان (1341)، مقدمه‌ای بر فلسفه آموزش‌وپرورش، ترجمة ا.ح.آریان‌پور، تبریز: کتاب‌فروشی تهران.
رابینسون، چیس اف ( 1389)، تاریخ‌نگاری اسلامی، ترجمة مصطفی سبحانی، تهران: پژوهشکده تاریخ اسلام.
زرین‌کوب، عبدالحسین (1362)، تاریخ در ترازو (دربارة تاریخ نگری و تاریخ‌نگاری)، تهران: امیرکبیر.
سیف، علی‌اکبر ( 1384)، روان‌شناسی پرورشی (روان‌شناسی یادگیری و آموزش)، تهران: آگاه.
شعبانی، حسن (1387)، مهارت‌های آموزشی و پرورشی روش‌ها و فنون تدریس، چاپ بیست‌ودوم، تهران: سمت
شکاری، عباس؛ خدادادی، مهدی (1390)، «کاربست اصول و معیارهای سازمان‌دهی محتوای برنامه درسی تاریخ ایران و جهان در دوره متوسطه»،  پژوهش‌های برنامه درسی، انجمن مطالعات برنامه درسی ایران، دورة اول، شمارة دوم، پاییز و زمستان.
شکوری، ابوالفضل (1371)، جریان‌شناسی تاریخ‌نگاری‌ها در ایران معاصر، تهران: بنیاد تاریخ ایران.
شهبا، علی (1397)، تحلیل و نقد محتوای کتب تاریخ متوسطة دورة دوم دبیرستان بر اساس رویکرد دیدگاه اسلام در آموزش تاریخ، مقطع کارشناسی ارشد، رشته علوم تربیتی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان.
صیامیان گرجی، زهیر؛ صالحی، کورش (1392)، «از تاریخ سیاسی تا سیاست تاریخ: بررسی انتقادی بازنمایی تاریخ تحولات ایران دوره آل بویه در کتاب‌های درسی دانشگاهی»، پژوهش و نگارش کتب دانشگاهی، شمارة 28، بهار، صص 62- 76.
عسکرانی، محمدرضا (1389)، «آسیب‌شناسی آموزش تاریخ در نظام تعلیم و تربیت ایران (بررسی موردی عصر قاجار تا پایان دورة رضاشاه)»، مطالعات تاریخ فرهنگی؛ پژوهش‌نامۀ انجمن ایرانی تاریخ، سال دوم، شمارة پنجم، صص 143-169.
فریره، پائولو (1358)، آموزش ستمدیدگان، ترجمه احمد بی‌رشک و سیف‌الله داد، تهران: خوارزمی
کوربن، هانری (1369 ). فلسفه ایرانی و فلسفه تطبیقی، جواد طباطبایی، تهران: طوس.
 مفتخری، حسین (1391)، «توصیف و تبیین و تفسیر در تحقیقات تاریخی»، کتاب ماه تاریخ و جغرافیا، شمارة 146، تیرماه. صص2-13.
متقی زاده و همکاران (1389)، «بررسی و نقد میزان استفاده دبیران از راهبردهای تدریس متون کتاب عربی دوره پیش‌دانشگاهی»، مجله نوآوری‌های آموزشی، شمارة 35.
 مقرب الهی، زهرا (1391)، «روش‌های نوین تدریس»، مجله موج، شمارة 5. صص 48-77.
 ملایی تونی، علی‌رضا (1389)، «تأملی در آموزش دانش تاریخ در ایران با تأکید بر دورة پس از انقلاب فرهنگی»، پژوهشنامة انجمن ایرانی تاریخ، سال اول، شمارة چهارم، تابستان، صص 171- 190.
ملایی توانی، علیرضا (1401)، «مبدأ دوره جدید تاریخ ایران کجاست؟»، فصلنامة علمی تاریخ اسلام و ایران دانشگاه الزهرا، سال سی و دوم، دورة جدید، شمارة 54، پیاپی 144، صص 161- 181.
ملکی، حسن (1384)، برنامه‌ریزی درسی (راهنمای عمل)، تهران: پیام اندیشه.
ناظری، مهرداد (1396)، جامعه‌شناسی نخبه‌پرور، تهران: نشر علم.
هاتنسن، استیسی (1390)، «ساختن تاریخ؛ راهنمای یادگیری و آموزش تاریخ در مدارس استرالیا»، ترجمة زهیر صیامیان گرجی، کتاب ماه تاریخ و جغرافیا، شهریور، شمارة 160، صص 19-27.
هدایت ،رضاقلی‌خان (1383 ش)،  فهرس التواریخ، تصحیح و تشحیه: عبدالحسن نوایی و میرهاشم محدث، تهران، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی.
یارمحمدیان، محمدحسین ( 1392)، اصول برنامه‌ریزی درسی، چاپ دوازدهم، تهران: یادواره کتاب.
Balakrishnan S. ( 2005), “Competency based education system, Bangalore,” India Institute of Science.
Griffiths, J., Magga, H. & George, E. (2007), Stakeholder Involvement, Switzerland World Health Organization
Jones, Adrian (2011), “Teaching History at University through Communities of
Inquiry”, Australian Historical Studies, 42: 2, pp. 168-193.
Lowenthal D. (1985), The past is a foreign country, New York: Cambridge
University Press
Luis, R., & Rapanta, C. (2020), “Towards (re-) defining historical reasoning competence: A review of theoretical and empirical research,” Educational Research Review, 31, 100336.
McComas, W. F. (2020), “Considering a consensus view of nature of science content for school science purposes,” In Nature of science in science instruction (pp. 23–34)
 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_2.
McGrew, S., Breakstone, J., Ortega, T., Smith, M., & Wineburg, S. (2018), “Can students evaluate online sources? Learning from assessments of civic online reasoning,” Theory & research in social education, 46(2), 165-193.
Mckeown, Margaret & Beck, Isabel. (1990), “The Assessment and Characterization”.
Mendez, S., & Tirado, F. (2016). Enhancing Historical Reasoning: A Strategy Including Formative Assessment with Systematic Continuous Feedback. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 5(2), 187-219.
-Muriirs Isabella Mwathwana,Chegge hangai,…,(2014).”an analysis of history teaching methodology in high school: a case of tigania and igmbe districts”, journal of education and practice of Young Learners' Knowledge of a Topic in History”, American Educational
Research Journal, 27, pp. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312027004688.
Paul, R. (2020), “Critical thinking, moral integrity, and citizenship: teaching for the intellectual virtue,” In Guyjmun Axtell (ed.), Knowledge, Belief, and Character: Readings in Virtue Epistemology. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 163-175.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21216.
Puteh, S. N., Maarof, N., & Tak, E. (2010), “Students’ perception of the teaching of historical thinking skills,” Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 18, 87-95.
Sendur, K. A., Van Drie, J., VanBoxtel, C., & Kan, K. J. (2022), “Historical reasoning in an undergraduate CLIL course: students’ progression and the role of language proficiency,” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(6), 2058-2074.
VanBoxtel, C., & VanDrie, J. (2013), “Historical reasoning in the classroom: What does it look like and how can we enhance it?,” Teaching History, (150), 44.
VanDrie, J. (2005). Learning about the past with new technologies: Fostering historical reasoning in computer-supported collaborative learning (Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University).
VanSledright, B. (1998). On the Importance of Historical Positionality to Thinking about and Teaching History. International Journal of Social Education, 12 (2): 1-18.
Walsh, W. H. (1967), An Introduction to the Philosophy of History, London: Hutchinson.
Wheelahan, Leesa and Carter, Richard (2001), “Notional Training Packages: A New Curriculum Framework for Vocational Education and Training in Australia”, Education+ Training, Vol. 43. No. 6, pp. 303-316, Available at: http://www. Emerald - library. com.
Wijayasari, E., Wati, K., & Winarsih, M. (2020), “Challenge of History Teachers in Teaching and.Learning Higher Order Thinking Skills (Hots),” Historical Studies Journal , 30(1), 36-45 .
Yilmaz, K. (2008), “A Vision of History Teaching and Learning: Thoughts on History Education
in Secondary Schools,” The High School Journal , 92(2), 37-46.
 
reference
Ahmadi, T. &Ahmadi, Gh. (2018), “History Education: Necessities and New Methods”, The Growth of History Education, Fall, Volume 20, Number 1, Serial 69, 26-31. [In Persian].
Asadollahi, Fatemeh; Mehrmohammadi, Mahmoud (2019), “Analyzing the effect of reflective narrative writing on the professional development of student teachers at Farhangian University; Phenomenology of lived experiences,” Teaching and Learning Research, 16(2), pp. 87-102.
Askarani, M.(2010), “Pathology of History Teaching in the Iranian Education System (Case Study from the Qajar Era to the End of Reza Shah's Reign),” Cultural History Studies; Research Bulletin of the Iranian History Association, Year 2, Issue 5, pp. 143-169 . [In Persian].
Bagheri, K. (2010), An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Vol. 2, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural. [In Persian].
Bagheri, K& Bagheri, M . (2014), “Cosmological Causality, Human Agency and Principles of Education in Ghazali's Perspective,” Two Quarterly Research Journals of Educational Sciences from an Islamic Perspective.pp.71-92.  10.30497/EDUS.2015.57482 [In Persian].
Bagheri, K. & Sajjadieh, N. (2011), “History Lesson Objectives Based on an Islamic Approach in Curriculum Philosophy,” Curriculum Research, Iranian Curriculum Studies Association, Volume 1, Issue 1, Spring and Summer, pp. 111-138.  10.22099/JCR.2012.245 [In Persian].
Balakrishnan S. ( 2005), Competency based education system, Bangalore, India Institute of Science
Corbin, H. (1980), Iranian Philosophy and Comparative Philosophy, Javad Tabatabaei, Tehran, Tous.pp.66-79. [In Persian].
Dewey, J. (1962), An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education, translated by A.H. Arianpour, Tabriz: Tehran Bookstore.pp.154. [In Persian].
  Dewey, John (2014), An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education or Democracy and Education, Desert Illumination. [In Persian].
Dewey, J. (1980), Experience and Education, Translator: Akbar Mir-Hosseini, Tehran: Book Translation and Publishing Center: PP.90.151. [In Persian]
Griffiths, J., Magga, H. & George, E.(2007), StakeholderInvolvement; Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Freire, Paulo (1979), Education of the Oppressed, translated by Ahmad Bi-Rashak and Seifullah Dad, Tehran: Kharazmi.
Hedayat, R. (2004), Index of Chronicles, corrected and corrected by: Abdolhassan Navai and Mir Hashem Muhaddis, Tehran, Humanities Research Institute. [In Persian]
History Educational Program (2022), Tehran: Ministry of Science.
Huttonsen, S. (2011), Making History: A Guide to Learning and Teaching History in Australian Schools, translated by Zuhair Siamian-Gorji, History and Geography Month Book, September 2011, No. 160, pp. 19-27. [In Persian].
Ibn Athir, E. (1996), Al-Kamal fi al-Tarikh(n.d.), Vol. 1/ 9-10, Haqqah and Attani by Dr. Omar Abd al-Salam Tadmari, Part I, Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-Arabi. [in Arabic].
Jones, Adrian (2011), “Teaching History at University through Communities of
Inquiry”, Australian Historical Studies, 42: 2, pp. 168-193.
Lowenthal D. (1985), The past is a foreign country. New York: Cambridge
University Press .
Luis, R., & Rapanta, C. (2020), “Towards (re-) defining historical reasoning competence: A review of theoretical and empirical research,” Educational Research Review, 31, 100336.
 Maleki, Hassan (2005), Curriculum Planning (Practical Guide), Tehran: Payam Andisheh.
Matthews, M. (2000), Foreword and introduction, The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies. Ed by William F., McComas. London: Kluwer academic publishers.
McComas, W. F. (2020), “Considering a consensus view of nature of science content for school science purposes”. In Nature of science in science instruction (pp. 23–34).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_2.
McGrew, S., Breakstone, J., Ortega, T., Smith, M., & Wineburg, S. (2018), “Can students evaluate online sources? Learning from assessments of civic online reasoning,” Theory & research in social education, 46(2), 165-193.
Mckeown, Margaret & Beck, Isabel. (1990), “The Assessment and Characterization of Young Learners' Knowledge of a Topic in History”, American Educational Research Journal, 27, pp. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312027004688.
Mendez, S., & Tirado, F. (2016), “Enhancing Historical Reasoning: A Strategy Including Formative Assessment with Systematic Continuous Feedback,” International Journal of Educational Psychology, 5(2), 187-219.
Mollaei Tavani, A.(2010), “A Reflection on Teaching History in Iran with Emphasis on the Post-Cultural Revolution Period”, Journal of the Iranian History Association, Year 1, Issue 4, Summer. pp.162-163, 171-190. [In Persian].
Mollaei Tavani, A.( 2022), “Where is the origin of the new period in Iranian history?,” Al-Zahra University's Islamic and Iranian History Quarterly, Year 32, New Period, No. 54, Serial 144, pp. 161-181. https://doi.org/10.22051/hii.2022.38812.2593 [In Persian].
Mottaghi Zadeh et al. (2010), “Review and critique of teachers' use of teaching strategies for Arabic textbooks in pre-university education,” Journal of Educational Innovations, No. 35.
Moqrab Elahi, Z. (2012), “New Teaching Methods,” Moj Magazine, Issue 5.pp.48-77. [In Persian].
Muriirs Isabella Mwathwana, Chegge hangai (2014),”an analysis of history teaching methodology in high school: a case of tigania and igmbe districts”, journal of education and practice.
Nazeri, M. (2017), “Elite Sociology,” Tehran: Alam Publishing.pp.161-162. [In Persian].
Sendur, K. A., Van Drie, J., VanBoxtel, C., & Kan, K. J. (2022), “Historical reasoning in an undergraduate CLIL course: students’ progression and the role of language proficiency,”  International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(6), 2058-2074.
Paul, R. (2020), “Critical thinking, moral integrity, and citizenship: teaching for the intellectual virtue”. In Guyjmun Axtell (ed.), Knowledge, Belief, and Character: Readings in Virtue Epistemology. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 163-175.
 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21216.
Puteh, S. N., Maarof, N., & Tak, E. (2010), “Students’ perception of the teaching of historical thinking skills,” Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 18, 87-95.
Robinson, Chase F. (2010), Islamic Historiography, translated by Mostafa Sobhani, Tehran: Islamic History Research Institute.
Seif, Ali Akbar (2005), Educational Psychology (Psychology of Learning and Education), Tehran: Aghah.
Shabani, Hassan (2008), Educational and Developmental Skills, Teaching Methods and Techniques, 22nd Edition, Tehran: Samt.
Shahba, A. (2018), “Analysis and Criticism of the Content of Secondary History Books in the Second Year of High School Based on the Approach of the Islamic Perspective in History Teaching,” Master's Degree, Educational Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman.pp.24 . [In Persian]
Shakuri, Abolfazl (1992), The Flow of Historiography in Contemporary Iran, Tehran: Iranian History Foundation.
Shekari, Abbas; Khodadadi, Mehdi (2011), “Application of principles and criteria for organizing the content of the Iranian and world history curriculum in secondary school,” Curriculum Research, Iranian Curriculum Studies Association, first volume, second issue, fall and winter.
Siamian-Gorji, Z&Salehi, K. (2013), “From Political History to the Politics of History: A Critical Study of the Representation of the History of Iranian Developments during the Buyid Period in University Textbooks,” Research and Writing of University Textbooks, No. 28, Spring, pp. 62-69-76. [In Persian].
Stanford, M. (2005), An Introduction to Historical Studies, translated by Masoud Sadeghi, Tehran, Samt and Imam Sadeq University Publications. [In Persian].
VanBoxtel, C., & VanDrie, J. (2013), “Historical reasoning in the classroom: What does it look like and how can we enhance it?” Teaching History, (150), 44.
VanDrie, J. (2005), Learning about the past with new technologies: Fostering historical reasoning in computer-supported collaborative learning (Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University).
VanSledright, B. (1998), “On the Importance of Historical Positionality to Thinking about and Teaching History,” International Journal of Social Education, 12 (2): 1-18.
Walsh, W. H. (1967), An Introduction to the Philosophy of History, London: Hutchinson.
Wheelahan, Leesa & Carter, Richard (2001), “Notional Training Packages: A New Curriculum Framework for Vocational Education and Training in Australia,” Education+ Training, Vol. 43. No. 6, pp. 303-316, Available at: http://www. Emerald - library. com.
Wijayasari, E., Wati, K., & Winarsih, M. (2020). Challenge of History Teachers in Teaching and.Learning Higher Order Thinking Skills (Hots). Historical Studies Journal , 30(1), 36-45.
Yarmohammadian, Mohammad Hossein (2013), Principles of Curriculum Planning, 12th edition, Tehran: Yadvareh Kitab.
Yilmaz, K. (2008), “A Vision of History Teaching and Learning: Thoughts on History Education in Secondary   Schools,” The High School Journal , 92(2), 37-46.
Zarrinkoob, A. (1983), “History on the Scale (About Historiography and Historiography),” Tehran: Amirkabir.PP.-11-54-258. [In Persian].
 
University Textbooks; Research and Writting
Volume 29, Issue 56 - Serial Number 56
September 2025
Pages 301-328