University Textbooks; Research and Writting

University Textbooks; Research and Writting

University textbooks for official (legal) translation: Reviewing and proposing a model for textbook development

Document Type : Research Paper

Author
Majid Fatahipour
Assistant Professor, Department of English Language, Faculty of the Humanities, Parand Branch of Islamic Azad University, Parand-Iran
10.30487/rwab.2020.112189.1354
Abstract
Official Translation, that is also called Legal Translation, or Translation of Correspondence and Documents is an extremely important enterprise that has a lot of potential for creating many jobs in labor market, but received little attention in terms of academic research. Official translation requires advanced knowledge of general language (both source language and target language), familiarity with legal knowledge of both source and target ‎countries, and familiarity with translatable documents. Translators should learn these skills through lots of practice; therefore, a 4-unit course of “translation of correspondence and related documents” is not enough for mastering these skills. This paper critically studies the method of translation teaching, reviews the existing official translation textbooks that are published under the title of “translation of correspondence and documents”, assesses market needs, and presents alternatives for a more systematic method of textbook writing – all within the framework of theories such as Scopus in translation studies, and also within the diverse modern educational-assessment frameworks, including task-based technology-aided teaching. However, the other dimensions of these textbooks will not be addressed here since they are beyond the scope of this research. The findings of this research may throw some light on how the gap between teaching and evaluation on the one hand, and the gap between knowledge and skills on the other hand can be bridged, and show how translators can meet the real-life and legitimate expectations in the official translation labor market. Applying the guidelines suggested in this article may help establish a more reliable link between university and official translation labor market, and also financial and time costs in both sectors.
Keywords
official translation
legal translation
translation of corres-pondence and documents
methods of teaching and assessment
اصلان‌زاده، رحیم (1398). ترجمة مکاتبات و اسناد (1) و (2)، چاپ یازدهم، تهران:‌سمت.
توانگر، مسعود (1380). ترجمة مکاتبات و اسناد (1) و (2)، تهران: دانشگاه پیام نور.
جعفری گهر، منوچهر و بهروز جمالوندی (1397). «معیارهای کتاب تخصصی مطلوب در رشتۀ زبان انگلیسی»، پژوهش و نگارش کتب دانشگاهی، دورة 22، شمارة 43، ص 90- 115.
راعی شریف، مسعود (1386). ترجمة مکاتبات و اسناد (1) و (2)، چاپ هشتم، تهران: سمت.
فتاحی‌پور، مجید (1395). «روان‌شناسی مهارت نگارش: ابهام‌پذیری عاملی مؤثر بر کمّیت و کیفیت نگارش زبان انگلیسی»، پژوهش‌های زبان‌شناختی در زبان‌های خارجی، دورة 6، شمارة 2،ص 393ـ416.
فرح‌زاد، فرزانه (1394)، فرهنگ جامع مطالعات ترجمه، با همکاری افسانه محمدی شاهرخ، تهران: نشر علمی.
قنسولی، بهزاد (1395). سنجش ترجمه در محیط آموزشی، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی.
نصر، احمدرضا، سولومونیدز، این و الیسون کامرون (1392)، «علل و چگونگی تدوین درس جدید و موانع آن در دانشگاه‌های استرالیا»، پژوهش و نگارش کتاب‌ها دانشگاهی، دورة 17، شمارة 29، ص 18ـ42.
نوریان، محمد (1393). «روش‌های ارزشیابی کتاب‌های درسی دانشگاهی، مزایا و محدودیت‌ها»، پژوهش و نگارش کتاب‌ها دانشگاهی، (33) 18، ص 1ـ17.
 
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing, Oxford University Press.
Bachman, L. F., & A. S. Palmer (1996). Language Testing in Practice: Designing and Developing Useful Language Tests, Vol. 1, Oxford University Press.
Biel, Łucja (2017). “Researching legal translation: A multi-perspective and mixed-method framework for legal translation”, Revista de Llengua i Dret, Journal of Language and Law, issue 68, pp. 76-88. DOI: 10.2436/rld.i68.2017.2967
Davies, M. G. (2004). Multiple Voices in the Translation Classroom: Activities, Tasks and Projects, Vol. 54, John Benjamins Publishing.
Harvey, M. (2000). “A Beginner’s Course in legal translation: The case of culture-bound terms”, in: ASTTI/ETI, pp. 357-369.
Harvey, M. (2002). “What’s so special about legal translation?”, Meta: Journal des Traducteurs/Meta: Translators’ Journal, 47(2): 177-185.
Holz-Mänttäri, J. (1984). Translatorisches Handeln: Theorie und Methode, pp. 230-251, Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.
Ramos, F. P. (2019). “The use of corpora in legal and institutional translation studies”, Translation Spaces, 8(1): 1-11.
Sarcevic, S. & M. Harvery (1997). New Approach to Legal Translation, The Hague/London/ Boston, Kluwer Law International.
Scott, Juliette (2017). Legal Translation – A Multidimensional Endeavour. Comparative Legilinguistics, [S.l.], v. 32, p. 37-66, dec. 2017. ISSN 2080-5926. Available at: <https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/cl/article/view/12180>. Date accessed: 24 july 2019. doi:https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2017.32.2.
Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories we Live by, London: Routledge.
Sursock, A. (2001). “Quality and innovation in higher education,” in N. Baijnath, S. Maimela and P. Singh (Eds.), Quality Assurance in Open and Distance Learning, University of South Africa and Technikon South Africa, Pretoria, pp. 81-93.
Vermeer, H. (1996). A Skopos Theory of Translation, Heidelberg