University Textbooks; Research and Writting

University Textbooks; Research and Writting

A review on the book " Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology " based on university textbook standards

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
Susan Talebi 1
Mohammadreza Nili Ahmadabadi 2
1 Educational technology department, , Psychology and educational sciences faculty, Allameh Tabatabaie university, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Technology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran Iran
10.30487/rwab.2024.2021109.1599
Abstract
The purpose of the current research is to review the book "Design and Educational Technology, trends and Issues" as one of the academic books in the specialized field of educational technology. The research method is a critical analysis based on the evaluation criteria of university textbooks by Mansourian (2013). The book, 's special feature focusied on AECT definition of educational technology, and based on that, the sections and chapters of the book have been formed to explain its key terms. Another feature is the authors' emphasis on educational design and performance improvement along with educational technology and calling the field "educational design and technology". Based on the findings, among the strengths and points of the criticized work are the competence and record of the authors, coherence. integrity of content and structure, consistency with learning theories, citation ability and interdisciplinary nature, specialization and thematic purposefulness, and ability Theory and practical implications. Some of the examined weaknesses are the lack of modernity and use of old standards and little attention to the new concepts of thoughtful educational technology. Also, in the standard of writing and literary cleanliness of the Persian translated version, the existence of translation, writing and typing problems has reduced the accuracy of the content. Despite the significant points of the criticized work in the findings of the present research, it seems that by solving the mentioned problems, this work, along with the current resources of the field, can improve the knowledge of students in the field of educational technology.
Keywords
Critical Review
Educational technology
Instructional design
Performance improvement

Subjects

  1. Armend, Mohammad; Maleki, Hassan (1391). Moqaddame-i bar shiveh-ye tarahi va ta’alif ketab-e darsi daneshgahii. Tehran: Samt.

  2. Hatami, Javad (1402). Teknolozhi-ye amuzeshii. Tehran: Samt.

  3. Hosseini, Seyed Mohammad Hossein (1399). “Naqdi bar ketab-e barnameh-ye darsi dar doreh-ye motavasset.” Pazhuheshnameh-ye enteghadi matn va barnamehaye olume insani(10)20, 21-47.

  4. Delrooz, Kazem; Gharabaghi, Hassan (1402). “Naqdi bar ketab-e Moqaddamat-e teknolozhi-ye amuzeshii.” Pazhuheshnameh-ye enteghadi matn va barnamehaye olume insani (3)23, 29-55.

  5. Raiser, Robert E.; Dempsey, John V. (1400). Tarahi va teknolozhi-ye amuzeshii, ravandha va masail. Tarjomeh-ye Morteza Karmi va Javad Gholami, Tehran: Aij.

  6. Rostami Nejad, Mohammad Ali (1399). “Naqdi bar ketab-e Mookha, tarahi, karbord va model-haye kasb o kar”. Pazhuheshnameh-ye enteghadi matn va barnamehaye olume insani (10)20 (piyapi 86), 153-173.

  7. Raeis Dana, Farokh Laghha (1397). “Az teknolozhi, be teknolozhi-ye fikr, roshd-e fanavariye amuzeshii”, #2.

  8. Zarei Zowarki, Ismail (1391). Tarahi-ye amuzeshii va mohit-haye yadgiri ba roykard-e talifiqi: Naqdi bar model-haye pishin va araye madalaki novin dar in zaminah. Ravan-shenasi Tarbiti, (24)8.

  9. Sheikh, Reza; Abasi Talaei, Ali; va Abasi, Mohammad (1393). “Tarahi ye charchubeh-i nezammand baraye tadvin ketab-haye darsi ba roykard-e teknik tarahi mabni bar badehiyat, mataleye morde”. Do Faslnameh-ye Pazhuhesh va Negarish Ketabhaye Daneshgahii (33)18, 68-88.

  10. Talebi, Sekineh; va Nili Ahmadabadi, Mohammad Reza (1399). “Naqdi bar ketab-e graphic dar khidmat-e yadgiri, dastoralikhaye elmi baraye barnameh-rizi, tarahi va arzyabi ye namoodhaye bisari dar mavade amuzeshii.” Pazhuheshnameh-ye enteghadi matn va barnamehaye olume insani. (10)20, 285-305.

  11. Aliabadi, Khadijeh (1401). Moqaddamat-e teknolozhi-ye amuzeshii, chap 17, Tehran: Daneshgah-e Payam Noor.

  12. Fardaneshi, Hashem (1402). Mabani nazari-ye teknolozhi-ye amuzeshii, chap 21, Tehran: Samt.

  13. Fardaneshi, Hashem (1401). Tarahi-ye amuzeshii, mabani, roykardha va karbordha, chap 6, Tehran: Samt.

  14. Karami, Morteza; va Hajazi, Zahra (1393). “Shenasaei, moghayeseh va tahlil-e gerayesh-haye mo’aze-ye ketabhaye darsi daneshgahii rasht-e teknolozhi-ye amuzeshii dar Iran va jahan.” Pazhuhesh va Negarish Ketabhaye Daneshgahii (32)18, 19-48.

  15. Mansourian, Yazdan (1392). “Sad vizhegiye ketabhaye daneshgahii karamad va asar-bakhsh.” Pazhuhesh va Negarish Ketab Daneshgahii, shomareh 29, 1-17.

  16. Mo’menirad, Akbar; Ghasemtabar, Seyed Abdullah; Poorjamshidi, Maryam (1402). “Tahlil-e enteghadi ketab-e mabani nazari-ye teknolozhi-ye amuzeshii,” Pazhuhesh va Negarish Ketab Daneshgahii, (113)121, 27-95.

  17. Noorouzi, Dariush; Velayati, Elaheh; va Vahdani Asadi, Mohammad (1402). Teknolozhi-e amuzeshii pishrafteh, chap 3, Tehran: Samt.

  18. Noorouzi, Dariush; va Razavi, Seyed Abbas (1402). Mabani tarahi amuzeshii, chap 12, Tehran: Samt.

  19. Nili Ahmadabadi, Mohammad Reza (1388). “Baresi-ye karbord ghavami-rastan-e raseh teknolozhi-ye amuzeshii az nazar-e daneshjuyan va mohtava-ye barnameh-ye darsi masnoob.” Faslnameye Ravan-shenasi Tarbiti, (14)5, 73-95.

  20. Nili Ahmadabadi, Mohammad Reza; va Dana, Ali (1396). “Jostari bar ab’ade va mo’allef-haye arzyabi naqadane ketabhaye darsi daneshgahii ba takid bar osul-e tarahi va sazmandahiye payam-haye amuzeshii”, Pazhuheshnameh-ye enteghadi matn va barnamehaye olume insani, (7)17, piaypi 50, 219-233.

English Language Sources:

  1. Burns, M. (2024). Teaching Strengths Quiz - Find Out Your Superpower. All things EdTech. Link

  2. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2004). The Systematic Design of Instruction. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers. Allyn & Bacon; 6th edition.

  3. Hannafin, M. J., & Hill, J. R. (2007). Epistemology and the design of learning environment. In: Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (Eds.). Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology. Columbus, OH: Pearson, pp. 53-61.

  4. Herold, B. (2016). Technology in education: An overview. Education Week, 20, 129-141.

  5. Hong, J., et al. (2018). “Design guideline of 2.5D package with emphasis on warpage control and thermal management.” IEEE 68th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), pp. 682-692. DOI: 10.1109/ECTC.2018.00108.

  6. McCulloch, G. (2015). Technology and Education: A History. The Struggle for the History of Education. Historical Studies in Education / Revue d’histoire de l’éducation. DOI: hse/rhe.v25i2.4355.

  7. Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. L. (2005). Educating the Net G. Link

  8. Perrin, N. (2023). Integration of Instructional Design and Technology: Volume 3. Power Learning Solutions. A part of: The Evolution of Educational Technology in Inclusive Learning Spaces from Pre to Post Pandemic. Robert Power. ISBN: 978-1-9993825-9-9.

  9. Pike, M. M., Barnes, M. A., & Barron, R. W. (2010). The role of illustration in children’s inferential comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(3), 243-255.

  10. Piskurich, G. M. (2006). Rapid Instructional Design: Learning ID Fast and Right. 2nd ed. US: Pfeiffer.

  11. Pouzet, M., Dubois, M., Béakou, K., & Charlet, A. (2017). The effect of lignin on the reactivity of natural fibres towards molecular fluorine. Materials & Design, 120, 66-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.01.086.

  12. Reigeluth, C.-C., & A. A. (2009). Instructional-Design Theories and Models Volume III, Building a Common Knowledge Base. Taylor and Francis Publishers, New York and London.

  13. Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Tracey, M. W. (2011). The instructional design knowledge base: Theory, research, and practice. Retrieved from: DOI: 10.4324/9780203840986.

  14. Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (2021). Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology (4th edition). Published by Pearson. Link.

  15. Reiser, R. A. (2007). What field did you say you were in? In R. A. Reiser and J. V. Dempsey (Eds.). Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology (2nd ed.), Columbus, Ohio: Pearson Education, Inc.

  16. Serasi, R., Fatimah, L., Hakim, M. A. R., & Anggraini, D. (2021). A textbook evaluation on English textbook entitled “Grow with English” used by students of MI Nurul Huda Bengkulu City. Al-Lughah: Jurnal Bahasa, 10(1), 21-31.

  17. Scharaldi, K. (2023). What are the benefits of teaching math using technology? Texthelp, 2020. Link.

  18. Selwyn, N. (2015). Technology and Education: Why it’s crucial to be critical. In: Bluefin, S., Johnson, N. F., & Bigum, C. (Eds). Critical Perspectives on Technology and Education. Palgrave Macmillan’s Digital Education and Learning. DOI: 10.1057/9781137385451_14.

  19. Smith, C. (2014). Technology in Education: A Future Classroom. Link.

  20. Warlick, D. (2020). The Power of Technology in Education. Class Web: Cultivating the Internet for Learning.

  21. Zain, I. Md (2017). The collaborative instructional design system: An innovative instructional design tool for 21st Century learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(12). DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2017.051216